1.
Koopmann, T., Stubbemann, M., Kapa, M., Paris, M., Buenstorf, G., Hanika, T., Hotho, A., Jäschke, R., Stumme, G.: Proximity dimensions and the emergence of collaboration: a HypTrails study on German AI research. Scientometrics. (2021).
AbstractURLBibTeXEndNoteDOIBibSonomyDownload
Creation and exchange of knowledge depends on collaboration. Recent work has suggested that the emergence of collaboration frequently relies on geographic proximity. However, being co-located tends to be associated with other dimensions of proximity, such as social ties or a shared organizational environment. To account for such factors, multiple dimensions of proximity have been proposed, including cognitive, institutional, organizational, social and geographical proximity. Since they strongly interrelate, disentangling these dimensions and their respective impact on collaboration is challenging. To address this issue, we propose various methods for measuring different dimensions of proximity. We then present an approach to compare and rank them with respect to the extent to which they indicate co-publications and co-inventions. We adapt the HypTrails approach, which was originally developed to explain human navigation, to co-author and co-inventor graphs. We evaluate this approach on a subset of the German research community, specifically academic authors and inventors active in research on artificial intelligence (AI). We find that social proximity and cognitive proximity are more important for the emergence of collaboration than geographic proximity.
@article{koopmann2021proximity,
abstract = {Creation and exchange of knowledge depends on collaboration. Recent work has suggested that the emergence of collaboration frequently relies on geographic proximity. However, being co-located tends to be associated with other dimensions of proximity, such as social ties or a shared organizational environment. To account for such factors, multiple dimensions of proximity have been proposed, including cognitive, institutional, organizational, social and geographical proximity. Since they strongly interrelate, disentangling these dimensions and their respective impact on collaboration is challenging. To address this issue, we propose various methods for measuring different dimensions of proximity. We then present an approach to compare and rank them with respect to the extent to which they indicate co-publications and co-inventions. We adapt the HypTrails approach, which was originally developed to explain human navigation, to co-author and co-inventor graphs. We evaluate this approach on a subset of the German research community, specifically academic authors and inventors active in research on artificial intelligence (AI). We find that social proximity and cognitive proximity are more important for the emergence of collaboration than geographic proximity.},
author = {Koopmann, Tobias and Stubbemann, Maximilian and Kapa, Matthias and Paris, Michael and Buenstorf, Guido and Hanika, Tom and Hotho, Andreas and Jäschke, Robert and Stumme, Gerd},
journal = {Scientometrics},
keywords = {2021 itegpub kde kdepub myown publist regio},
title = {Proximity dimensions and the emergence of collaboration: a HypTrails study on German AI research},
year = 2021
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 koopmann2021proximity
%A Koopmann, Tobias
%A Stubbemann, Maximilian
%A Kapa, Matthias
%A Paris, Michael
%A Buenstorf, Guido
%A Hanika, Tom
%A Hotho, Andreas
%A Jäschke, Robert
%A Stumme, Gerd
%D 2021
%J Scientometrics
%R 10.1007/s11192-021-03922-1
%T Proximity dimensions and the emergence of collaboration: a HypTrails study on German AI research
%U https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03922-1
%X Creation and exchange of knowledge depends on collaboration. Recent work has suggested that the emergence of collaboration frequently relies on geographic proximity. However, being co-located tends to be associated with other dimensions of proximity, such as social ties or a shared organizational environment. To account for such factors, multiple dimensions of proximity have been proposed, including cognitive, institutional, organizational, social and geographical proximity. Since they strongly interrelate, disentangling these dimensions and their respective impact on collaboration is challenging. To address this issue, we propose various methods for measuring different dimensions of proximity. We then present an approach to compare and rank them with respect to the extent to which they indicate co-publications and co-inventions. We adapt the HypTrails approach, which was originally developed to explain human navigation, to co-author and co-inventor graphs. We evaluate this approach on a subset of the German research community, specifically academic authors and inventors active in research on artificial intelligence (AI). We find that social proximity and cognitive proximity are more important for the emergence of collaboration than geographic proximity.
URLBibTeXEndNoteDOIBibSonomy1.Hanika, T., Hirth, J.: Quantifying the Conceptual Error in Dimensionality Reduction. In: Braun, T., Gehrke, M., Hanika, T., and Hernandez, N. (eds.) Graph-Based Representation and Reasoning - 26th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2021, Virtual Event, September 20-22, 2021, Proceedings. pp. 105–118. Springer (2021).
BibTeXEndNoteBibSonomy1.Hanika, T., Kibanov, M., Kropf, J., Laser, S.: Ich denke, es ist wichtig zu verstehen, warum die Netzwerkanalyse jetzt populär und besonders interessant für die Forschung geworden ist. In: Kropf, J. and Laser, S. (eds.) Digitale Bewertungspraktiken. pp. 165–188. Springer (2019).
